|Left: a 1979 depiction of the four state Carnot cycle by American mechanical engineer Joseph Kestin, where the hot body and cold body temperatures are θ > θ0, and the heats, Q and Q0, are assumed to be different.  Right: The two step Papin cycle, as described by French physicist Denis Papin, in his 1690 Papin engine model, which is the basis for the Carnot cycle.|
The working substance (generally water) of the Carnot cycle is typically contained within the volume confines of piston and cylinder, with the implicit assumption that the cylindrical container has nonconducting lateral walls and a nonconducting piston, such that heat can only enter or leave the working substance at the base of the cylinder, by contact with either the hot body (generally a boiler) and the cold body (generally a spray of cold water). 
In 1690, French physicist Denis Papin, in his "A New Method to Obtain Very Great Motive Powers at Small Cost", introduced the two step Papin cycle description of a steam heat engine, loosely described by a step one of a person holding a fire under a water filled piston and cylinder (allowing expansion) followed by a step to of a person holding a tub of cold water under the piston and cylinder (allowing contraction).
This formed the basis of the theoretical heat engine devised by French physicist Sadi Carnot in his 1824 Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire. In this memoir, Carnot himself (according to the 1960 English translation by Eric Mendoza) seems to have used the term "series of operations" to describe the operation of the generic heat engine.
In 1834, French physicist Emile Clapeyron used the term "cycle of operations", in his graphical description of Carnot's model of the operation of the heat engine, to describe the "quantity of action" developed by changes of state, on going through in the steps 1:2:3:4, after which, when the body returns to state one, according to Clapeyron, the system is "in precisely it original state".
The actual person who coined or first used the term "Carnot cycle" needs to be tracked down.
The underlying 1690 two-step Papin cycle version of the Carnot cycle, in itself, is very simple: alternately heat and cool any given body (in the universe) and confine the resulting volume change expansions and contractions so as to to produce reciprocating motion (repetitive up-and-down or back-and-forth motion), motion which can be coupled to produce useful work, via a rocker arm (Newcomen engine, 1712), crank (Pickard engine, 1780), or sun and planet gear (Watt engine, 1781). 
The crux of the model, which invariably accounts for the underlying difficulty of thermodynamics, is Carnot's "re-establishment of equilibrium in the caloric" assumption that the "quantity of heat", previously existing in the body in its start state, "remains unchanged" when the body returns to its original or rather final starting point state; which is described by Emile Clapeyron as a state where system is "in precisely it original state" (1834); which is described by German physicist Rudolf Clausius as an "ingenious method in which the body is allowed to undergo various changes in succession, which are so arranged that it returns at last to its original condition."
What this has come to mean, thermodynamically, is the conclusion that in the hypothetical "reversible cycle", which is what the Carnot cycle is, the internal energy change is zero:
which says that the initial and final internal energy states of the system are the same.  The reasoning for Clausius' use of the term "ingenious" to describe Carnot's cycle, is that internal work, which the atoms and molecules of the system do on each other (which in human terms equates to non-compensated types of work people [human molecules] do on each other in a day), in the expansion stroke, WIE is assumed to exactly cancel out or compensate for the amount or measure of internal work done in the compression stroke, WIC. Stated mathematically:
Hence, this amount of "internal molecular work", which Clausius says is "impossible to determine exactly, in most cases", cancels out or is assumed to cancel out in the reversible cycle or process. Hence, for the Carnot cycle, the first law:
with ΔU = 0, becomes:
and thus the external useful work, i.e. that coupled to the movement of the rocker arm, crank, or sun and planet gear, done in one reversible Carnot cycle is given by the expression:
which says that the work output of the engine equals the heat input of expansion QE, i.e. that given up by the hot body to the working body, less the heat release of compression QC, i.e. that given up by the working body to the cold body, a sum of work quantified graphically by the area enclosed in the curvilinear parallelogram on the PV diagram (1:2:3:4, above, or ABDC, below). If, however, the two types of internal work do not exactly compensate each other, which occurs in what is called the irreversible cycle or irreversible process, then we have:
and one must make recourse to the infamous Clausius inequality:
and the concept of exact differential (as compared to the inexact differential), the condition for an exact differential, and then eventually to a study of the history of differential equations, and to modern mathematical abstractions such as Caratheodory's theorem (1908), as well as to modern quantum mechanical (Bohr model, 1913), quantum electrodynamical (c.1960s), and to particle physics (c.1980-present) descriptions of quantities of heat.
A noted definition derived from the Carnot cycle is efficiency, symbol eta, which is defined as the ratio of the work output of the engine to the heat input:
with substitution from previous derivation given above for the work output for the Carnot cycle:
or with simplification:
where QC is the heat leaving the working body during the compression stroke and QE is the heat entering the working body during the expansion stroke; or, said another way, using in different notation:
where QC is the heat leaving the working body (entering the cold body) during the compression stroke and QH is the heat entering the working body (from the hot body) during the expansion stroke.
|A 1937 physical depiction of the steps in the Carnot cycle by Italian-born American physicist Enrico Fermi, with the source and sink temperature description of T2 > T1. |
In his 1824 memoir ‘On the Motive Power of Fire’, Carnot explains how any physical body may be made to do work via expansions and contractions of its volume do to the action of heat additions or removals. This is based on what was then known as Boerhaave’s law, formulated in 1620s by Dutch chemist Herman Boerhaave.
According to Carnot, the choice of working body is arbitrary; it could be, for instance, vapor of alcohol, of mercury, of a permanent gas, or even a metallic bar alternately heated or cooled. For his cycle, Carnot used atmospheric air. In this manner, Carnot’s example working body, or working substance as he called it, was a system comprised of approximately ten chemical species: nitrogen (N2) 78%, oxygen (O2) 21%, as well as argon (Ar), neon (Ne), helium (He), methane (CH4), krypton (Kr), hydrogen (H2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and xenon (Xe), in smaller percentages.
To cause this working body of chemical species to perform useful work, we are told ‘to imagine two bodies A and B, kept each at a constant temperature, that of A being higher than that of B. These two bodies, to which we can give or from which we can remove heat without causing their temperatures to vary, exercise the functions of two unlimited reservoirs of heat.’ We shall call the first the furnace and the second the refrigerator. Motive power or work, according to Carnot, can thus be obtained by carrying a certain quantity of heat Q from body A, through the working body of chemical species, to body B.
The original description of the Carnot engine cycle process is actuated by following a series of heat movement steps, as detailed in seven stages, described by Carnot below, albeit with a few modern terminological substitutions (e.g. heat for caloric, etc.):
|Contact body A with the working body of chemical species or substance enclosed in space abcd or with the wall of this space; a wall that we will suppose to transmit heat readily. The working body becomes by such contact of the same temperature as body A; cd is the actual position of the piston.|
|The piston gradually rises and takes position ef. Body A is at all times in contact with the working species, which is thus kept at a constant temperature during the rarefaction. Body A furnishes the heat necessary to keep the temperature constant.|
|Body A is removed, and the working body is no longer in contact with any body capable of furnishing it with heat. The piston meanwhile continues to move, and passes to position gh. The working body is rarefied without receiving heat, and its temperature falls. Let us imagine that it falls till it becomes equal to that of body B; at which point the piston stops, remaining at gh.|
|The working body is placed in contact with body B; it is compressed by the return of the piston as it is moved from the position gh to the position cd. The working body remains, however, at a constant temperature because of its contact with body B, to which it yields heat.|
|Body B is removed, and the compression of the working body is continued, which being then isolated, its temperature rises. The compression is continued till the air acquires the temperature of body A. The piston passes at this time from the position cd to the position ik.||The hot body, working body, and cold body of the Carnot heat engine, labeled according to the stopping points in the various steps of the original version of seven-step Carnot cycle.|
|The working body is again placed in contact with body A. The piston returns from the position ik to the position ef; the temperature remains unchanged.|
|The step described in 3 is renewed, then successively the steps 4, 5, 6, 3, 4, 5, 6, 3, 4, 5, and so on.|
In this cycle, we can define two types of work being done by the working body. During the expansion phase when the piston is being pushed outward, in steps 1-3, we can define this as useful or positive work. Conversely, during the compression phase when the piston is being contracted inward, in steps 2-5, this constitutes negative or contraction work. The difference between the two constitutes the net work-output of the system.
The following are related quotes:
“He was a practical electrician fond of whiskey, a heavy, red-haired brute with irregular teeth. He doubted the existence of a deity but accepted Carnot’s cycle, and he had read Shakespeare and found him weak in chemistry.”— Herbert Wells (1906), "Lord of the Dynamos" (Ѻ); in: The Door in the Wall, and Other Stories 
1. (a) Perrot, Pierre. (1998). A to Z of Thermodynamics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(b) Fermi, Enrico. (1936). Thermodynamics (pg. 32-34). Prentice Hall.
2. Carnot, Sadi. (1824). “Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire and on Machines Fitted to Develop that Power.” Paris: Chez Bachelier, Libraire, Quai Des Augustins, No. 55.
3. Kestin, Joseph. (1979). A Course in Thermodynamics (Carnot cycle, pg. 417). Taylor and Francis.
4. Fermi, Enrico. (1936). Thermodynamics (pg. 32-34). Prentice Hall.
5. (a) Reciprocating motion – Wikipedia.
(b) Crank (mechanism) – Wikipedia.
(c) Sun and planet gear – Wikipedia.
(d) James Pickard – Wikipedia.
● Thims, Libb. (2007). Human Chemistry (Volume One), (section: Carnot’s thermal cycle, pgs. 51-53). (preview), (Google books). Morrisville, NC: LuLu.
● Carnot cycle – Wikipedia.