Stefani Engelstein

Stefani Engelstein In human chemistry, Stefani Brooke Engelstein (1970-) is an American anti-reductionist comparative literature scholar noted for her 2008 two cultures book Anxious Anatomy: the Conception of the Human Form in Literary and Naturalist Discourse, the second chapter of which is devoted to a dissection and interpretation of German polymath Johann Goethe’s 1809 physical chemistry based novella Elective Affinities, commenting, for example, on how Ottilie rejects talk of human kinship with monkeys (evolution theory), the ECHO cypher, how Goethe's "The Metamorphosis of Plants" (1790), "Metamorphosis of Animals" (1806), and Elective Affinities are to be viewed as a three-part treatise on metamorphology, the significance of the opening P1:C1 grafting scene, among other subjects. [1]

Elective Affinities
In 2008, Engelstein, in her Anxious Anatomy: the Conception of the Human Form in Literary and Naturalist Discourse, devoted her chapter "Formative Drives", on Goethe's Elective Affinities, albeit in some sense attempting to marginalize and to discredit the human chemical theory used by Goethe, arguing that: the title is a "misleading allusion"; that the "characters do not mimic the behavior of the chemicals to which they are compared"; that Goethe's famous anonymous advertisement was him pointing out that he was "not trying to map human relations into chemical reactions or vice versa"; that the theory used was an "outdated chemical concept"; that Goethe, in his essay "Analysis and Synthesis", and his mention of the Danaids, was his admittance that his theory "cannot hold water", etc., etc., and uses the term "fail" repetitively, in regards to the chemical theory. Engelstein cites Beda Allemann and Jeremy Adler in support of her position:

"Adler disputes the reductive determinism in Goethe's idea of nature, thus relieving the most dangerous consequence of the analogy for human decision making. Allemann goes one step further and demonstrates definitively that the analogy between chemical and characters fails."

That Adler "disputes reductive determinism", however, seems to be nearly a complete false assertion, nearly to the point of putting words in his mouth, being that Adler spent over a decade doing his PhD dissertation extolling the reductive deterministic human chemical reaction point of view in Goethe's work. In any event, the gist of Engelstein aversion to Goethe's human chemical theory, which Goethe defensively claimed was true, is found in the following statement by Engelstein:

"Just as the characters so failingly interpret the world around them, so we are confronted with the reality that the relations and affinities between things as well as between people, are a result of a fluctuating combination of will, chance, and law."

Engelstein, in short, has a belief system rooted in the doctrine of free will and that each person freely chooses between right and wrong, which is the polar opposite to Goethe's belief system, as stated famously P2:C5, namely that “none are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” Engelstein also in her mention of "chance" seems to admit belief in evolution occurring via a mixture of blind random chance and law. This again is the polar opposite of Goethe's metamorphosis theory (see: morphology) of evolution, according to which dynamic form change occurs via predetermined measures (see: prediction) of the force of chemical affinity.

Education
Engelstein completed her BA in literature at Yale University in 1992, her MA in comparative literature in 1994 and PhD in comparative literature in 2001 with a dissertation on the “Origins of Meaning: the ‘Natural’ Human Body in Literature and Science of the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries”, the latter both at the University of Chicago. Engelstein currently is a professor of German at the University of Missouri.

Science and society program
Since 2009, Engelstein has been the head of the Missouri University’s 2000-launched Life Sciences and Society Program, a field of study at the juncture of the science and culture, encompassing investigations of the historical, cultural, ethical, and economic contexts, which seems to be something in the sphere of the two cultures arena (see: two cultures university department). The program promotes the cultivation of connections between the logic and languages of the sciences, social sciences, and humanities. [2]

References
1. (a) Engelstein, Stefani. (2008). Anxious Anatomy: the Conception of the Human Form in Literary and Naturalist Discourse (§Goethe’s Monstrous Otto, pgs. 26-30; Metamorphology, pgs. 48-54; Elective Affinities or Chosen Correspondences, pgs. 55-60). SUNY Press.
(b) Abbott, Scott. (2011). “Review of Stefani Engelstein, Anxious Anatomy: the Conception of Human Form in Literary and Naturalistic Discourse”, Goethe Yearbook, XVIII: 323-25.
2. Life Sciences and Society Program – University of Missouri.

External links
Stefani Engelstein (faculty) – University of Missouri.
Engelstein, Stefani (1970-) – WorldCat Identities.

TDics icon ns

More pages